Metacognition Writing: the best way to add value I’m aware of
/By Duncan Anderson. To see all blogs click here.
Reading time: 3 mins
Summary: A unit of work = 1. A unit of exploration + 2. A unit of synthesis (Metacognition Writing). I often find that ~90% of the value comes in the ‘Unit of synthesis’... and that this takes ~10% of the overall time.
Analogy - How a PhD often is
90% of the time ≈ exploration
10% of the time ≈ synthesis (thesis writing AKA Metacognition Writing)
But…
Exploration ≈ 10% of value derived
Synthesis (thesis writing AKA Metacognition Writing) ≈ 90% of value derived
You have to do the 90% exploration time to be able to do the ‘thesis writing’ (synthesis). But I find that if you don’t do the thesis writing (Metacognition Writing) then you are often leaving 90% of value on the table.
Metacognition writing (synthesis)
“You don’t learn from your experiences, you learn from reflecting on your experiences.” John Dewy.
Reflecting on your experiences = Metacognition Writing
Metacognition Writing = Explaining what you are doing
Outcome = What you did * How you did it
How you did it = Metacognition writing (yes I know the words are contradicting)
I try to spend 10% of my week doing ‘Metacognition Writing’
If you work for 50 hours in a week I’d recommend doing 5 hours of Metacognition Writing.
Examples of Metacognition Writing:
The CloudStreaks blog. The CloudStreaks blog is intended to be ways to help Edrolo operate better as a company. I do ~50 hours a week on Edrolo and 1-2 hours a week of ‘Metacognition Writing’ for CloudStreaks on ways to hopefully help myself and / or others level up.
I do another 3-4 hours of ‘Metacognition Writing’ that is Edrolo internal only each week. Some examples of what this is:
I write an internal only blog at Edrolo weekly on Product Metacognition (like this CloudStreaks blog but on product only).
I’ll systematically write larger Metacognition pieces on any product I’m working on. For example Year 7 Humanities I’ll try and write out the top down recipe.
What I believe most of the company wide presentations I give to Edrolo are.
Well done ‘freeform thoughts’ people do in project updates to me count as ‘Metacognition Writing’.
Can you imagine doing all the exploration work for a PhD and then not writing a thesis (doing the synthesis AKA Metacognition Writing)? It would be stuid AF right? Well that is what I feel I was doing before I started to systematically do Metacognition Writing each week.
Jingle: Metacognition Writing = Mega cognition up levelling!
With the benefit of hindsight, I think I was heavily underweight the time I spent on ‘Metacognition Writing’ until ~3 years ago. In other words I was leaving a massive amount of value on the table.
Let’s assume that knowledge doesn’t compound (I’m of the view that most of the time knowledge compounds).
How could how much value you add be shown if you do ‘Metacognition Writing’ for 10% of your week vs don’t.
You are 10x up if you do ‘Metacognition Writing’ if these calcs are fair.
Honestly, it’s hard to describe how much I find that Metacognition Writing levels what I do up. It’s the single largest upgrade strategy I’m aware of.
If you only take away one thing
My recommendation is that you do a unit of Metacognition Writing on the key areas you want to upgrade each week. A unit of metacognition I normally find is 0.5-2 hours.
I think you likely want to have 1-3x personal things you are wanting to upgrade and 1-3x company areas you are wanting to upgrade.
So you are doing 3-5x units of Metacognition Writing per week.